Is it true that any process change is likely to plateau without constant review and revisions?

The assertion that any process change is likely to plateau without constant review and revisions is true because processes are often dynamic in nature. When a new process is implemented, it may initially show significant improvements in efficiency or effectiveness. However, over time, the benefits can diminish if the process is not regularly evaluated and adjusted in response to changing conditions, stakeholder feedback, or emerging practices.

Continuous review and adaptation are key principles of agile methodologies, which emphasize the importance of learning and evolving. Without ongoing vigilance, a team may fall into complacency, and the processes may become outdated, failing to meet current goals or challenges. Maintaining a culture of regular reflection, feedback, and iteration ensures that processes remain relevant and effective, allowing teams to respond to new insights and changing environments proactively.

In environments such as large organizations or specific processes, while those might influence the rate or nature of change, the fundamental need for ongoing review applies broadly across all contexts. Thus, regular assessments and updates are essential to prevent stagnation and to foster continuous improvement.