The primary advantage of breaking a project into phases is that:

The primary advantage of breaking a project into phases is that it enables teams to focus on critical themes and ease of governance. By organizing the project into distinct phases, teams can prioritize and address key objectives one at a time, allowing for focused effort on critical aspects of the project. This phased approach enhances visibility and control, making it easier for stakeholders to track progress and governance.

Furthermore, dividing a project into phases allows for iterative assessments and adjustments based on feedback, ensuring that teams can adapt their strategies as they gain insights from each phase. This agility fosters a more responsive environment where teams can align their work with stakeholder priorities and organizational goals.

While there may be merits to the other options mentioned, such as the notion of involving different teams based on specific phase requirements or conducting mini-waterfalls, these aspects do not capture the holistic benefit of focused thematic work and governance that comes from a phased approach. The emphasis on critical themes further ensures that the most pressing issues are addressed systematically, leading to better overall project outcomes.