Under which condition may a team evolve their life-cycle choices?

A team may evolve their life-cycle choices when they feel it is necessary because Agile methodologies emphasize adaptability and responsiveness to change. This principle aligns with the Agile mindset, allowing teams to continuously improve their processes based on their unique context, challenges, and lessons learned. When teams recognize that certain practices or processes are not yielding the desired results, they can make adjustments to enhance their efficiency and effectiveness.

This approach fosters a culture of ownership and accountability within the team, empowering them to make informed decisions regarding their workflows and practices. Teams can assess their performance retrospectively during reviews or retrospectives, leading to insights that can inform necessary adaptations to their life cycles, ensuring they remain aligned with their goals and the needs of the stakeholders they serve.

In contrast, evolving life-cycle choices solely at the start of a sprint may hinder responsiveness and limit the team's ability to adapt mid-course when new information or challenges arise. Changes driven only by management requests might not account for the team's direct observations and experiences, potentially leading to resistance or ineffective implementations. Lastly, waiting until the end of a project can be detrimental, as it does not allow for ongoing improvements throughout the project lifecycle, limiting the team's ability to respond to changing circumstances.