Which process goal is best suited for addressing technical debt in an existing solution?

Improving quality is the best process goal for addressing technical debt in an existing solution. Technical debt refers to the shortcuts taken during development that can lead to future problems, including higher maintenance costs and reduced performance. By focusing on improving quality, teams can allocate resources to refactor code, enhance testing practices, and eliminate the inefficiencies that contribute to technical debt.

When a team prioritizes quality, they often re-evaluate their current practices and make necessary adjustments to improve the robustness and maintainability of the solution. This results in a long-term reduction of technical debt as quality improvements make the codebase more adaptable to future changes, reduce bugs, and streamline processes.

The other options, while important in their own contexts, do not directly target the resolution of technical debt. For example, evolving the Way of Working may enhance team dynamics and processes, but it doesn't specifically address the technical aspects of debt. Addressing risk is crucial for mitigating potential failures but does not resolve existing issues related to technical debt. Securing funding is essential for ensuring resources, but it does not translate directly to addressing the technical aspects of an existing solution.